Dad’s name still on it?
Mutation After Death Checklist
Intkal, varsai, dakhil-kharij: the papers and steps to put land in the heirs’ names.
Use free toolNo power of attorney. Ever.Reports in English + your home languageSetup needs only a survey number or location pin
⚖️ Free tool
When a Hindu man dies without a will, his own property is split equally between his widow, each son, each daughter and his mother — so a widow, two sons, a daughter and a mother get one-fifth each. Answer a few questions about the family and this calculator shows every heir’s share as a fraction, a percentage and, if you like, in acres, kanal or bigha. It follows the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended in 2005, which also covers Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists.
Free · No sign-up · Runs privately in your browser· Figures checked 24 September 2026
The property splits into 5 equal shares
Who gets what
A guide to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — not legal advice. Family facts, earlier partitions, wills and local law can change the answer, so confirm shares with a lawyer before signing any partition, release or mutation papers.
His own property goes first to his Class I heirs, and they take at the same time, in equal shares (Sections 8 and 10 of the Hindu Succession Act). His widow takes one share, each son and each daughter takes one share, and his mother takes one share. If he left more than one widow, they split a single share between them.
Example: he leaves a widow, two sons, one daughter and his mother. That is five equal shares, so each of them gets 1/5. On 10 acres, that is 2 acres each — the daughter’s share is exactly the same as each son’s, whether or not she is married.
His father, brothers and sisters are not Class I heirs. They inherit only if there is no Class I heir at all, and then the father comes first.
A child who died earlier still counts as one share, and that share passes down their branch. For a late son, his widow and each of his children take equal portions of his share. For a late daughter, her children share it — her husband is not a Class I heir of her father.
Example: a man leaves a widow and one living son, and a son who died earlier leaving a wife and two children. There are three shares of 1/3: the widow, the living son, and the late son’s branch. The branch’s 1/3 is split three ways, so the late son’s wife and each child get 1/9.
If a late child left no spouse or children, their branch simply drops out and the others’ shares grow.
Yes. Since the 2005 amendment, a daughter is a coparcener by birth in joint-family (Mitakshara) property, with the same rights as a son. In Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020), the Supreme Court held that this right does not depend on the father being alive on 9 September 2005 — though partitions completed before 20 December 2004 are left undisturbed.
For joint property, the law first imagines a partition just before the death (Section 6(3)). Take a man who dies after 2005 leaving a widow, two sons, a daughter and his mother, with joint property held with his three children. It splits four ways — him and each child — so each child already owns 1/4. Only his 1/4 is inherited, one-fifth each to the widow, three children and mother. Each child ends with 3/10, and the widow and mother with 1/20 each.
Courts have in some cases also given the widow a share in that imagined partition, as in Gurupad Khandappa Magdum (1978), which increases her portion. The calculator lets you switch this on, but it depends on local Hindu law — ask a lawyer before relying on it.
Her husband, sons and daughters come first and share equally, with a late child’s children taking that child’s share (Sections 15 and 16). A late son’s widow does not inherit from her mother-in-law.
If none of them is alive, where the property came from matters. Property she inherited from her parents goes back to her father’s heirs; property from her husband or father-in-law goes to her husband’s heirs. Her other property goes to her husband’s heirs, then her parents. In Arunachala Gounder v. Ponnusamy (2022), the Supreme Court confirmed this ‘back to the source’ rule, and held that a daughter inherits her father’s self-acquired property in preference to his brothers’ sons.
Farmland: until 2005, Section 4(2) let state tenancy laws decide who inherited agricultural land, which often left daughters out. The 2005 amendment removed it, so the Act now applies to farmland too. State land-ceiling or tenancy rules can still affect a holding, so check how your state records the shares.
Uttar Pradesh is a notable exception: succession to bhumidhari farmland is recorded under Section 108 of the UP Revenue Code, 2006, which sets its own order of heirs (widow, sons and unmarried daughters first; married daughters later in the list). For UP farmland, use the shares the tehsil records under the Code, and see the varasat guide.
Goa: families domiciled in Goa follow the Goa (Portuguese) Civil Code instead, and the Supreme Court has held that it governs their property elsewhere in India too. Muslims follow Muslim personal law, and most Christians and Parsis follow the Indian Succession Act, 1925. This calculator does not work out those shares.
Exactly the same as each son’s. In his self-acquired property she is a Class I heir alongside her mother, brothers and grandmother. In joint-family property she has also been a coparcener by birth since 2005, so she owns a share in her own right and inherits from her father’s share as well.
Yes. Marriage makes no difference under the Hindu Succession Act. A married daughter inherits the same share as an unmarried daughter or a son, and since 2005 she is a coparcener in joint-family property too.
Both, equally. His widow, each son, each daughter and his own mother (the children’s grandmother) each take one equal share of his self-acquired property. The widow does not take everything, and the children do not have to wait for her to die.
She inherits from his share of it. Joint-family property is first divided as if partitioned just before his death, and his portion passes to his Class I heirs, including her. Some courts have also given the widow a share in that notional partition, so ask a lawyer how it applies in your state.
Usually not. Heirs apply for inheritance mutation (intkal, varsai or dakhil-kharij) at the tehsil to be recorded as co-owners. A court is needed only if the family disagrees, or for a formal partition when talks fail. Heirs who want to give up their share do so by a registered release deed.
Dad’s name still on it?
Intkal, varsai, dakhil-kharij: the papers and steps to put land in the heirs’ names.
Use free toolSold Dad’s land. Tax = ?
Tax on selling inherited land — 2001 value, CII indexation, NRI and resident rules.
Use free tool1 bigha = ? acres
Bigha, kanal, marla, guntha, cent, gaj, acre — with state-wise bigha values.
Use free toolEqual to your brother
⚖️ Legal basics 6 min read
Does a daughter have a share in ancestral property? Yes, equal to a son's since 2005, married or not. What Vineeta Sharma says, exceptions, how to claim.
Still in Dad’s name?
📜 Land records explained 6 min read
What land mutation (intkal, dakhil-kharij) is, its name in each state, why delaying inheritance mutation is risky for NRIs, and how to check its status online.
Your land record, decoded
📜 Land records explained 7 min read
Khasra, khatauni, jamabandi, 7/12, patta, khatian: what your Indian land record is called in each state, where to find it online and which number matters.
Ready to see your land for yourself?
Tell us the village or drop a pin — it takes about two minutes. We confirm the boundary with you before your first report.